Did the PGA mess-up?
The Clubhouse Lounge
|

08-15-2010, 09:09 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
|
|
|
Did the PGA mess-up?
Did the PGA mess-up their big tournament?
Let’s look at the chronology:
Likely playoff player 3 is addressed by PGA official after completion of regular play. Looks like the player was told of a possible rules violation.
This appears to be a surprise to player who is now faced with decision .
BUT
Did the player have a free decision, or was he intimidated by the PGA?
Were and are the PGA decisions and intended actions going to be the same regardless of the player’s decision?
Will the PGA put the same effort now into determining if a rule violation, in fact, did take place? I think not now that the player took the penalty.
BUT
What where the players true options. Either take the penalty OR risk an in depth review by the PGA that could result in a TOTAL disqualification for signing an incorrect score card.
No way to look at it other than the PGA messed-up big time.
Bears Thoughts
|
|

08-15-2010, 09:52 PM
|
 |
Lynn Blake Certified Associate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,955
|
|
Originally Posted by HungryBear
|
Did the PGA mess-up their big tournament?
Let’s look at the chronology:
Likely playoff player 3 is addressed by PGA official after completion of regular play. Looks like the player was told of a possible rules violation.
This appears to be a surprise to player who is now faced with decision .
BUT
Did the player have a free decision, or was he intimidated by the PGA?
Were and are the PGA decisions and intended actions going to be the same regardless of the player’s decision?
Will the PGA put the same effort now into determining if a rule violation, in fact, did take place? I think not now that the player took the penalty.
BUT
What where the players true options. Either take the penalty OR risk an in depth review by the PGA that could result in a TOTAL disqualification for signing an incorrect score card.
No way to look at it other than the PGA messed-up big time.
Bears Thoughts
|
If you look at the facts rationally, Mark Wilson and the PGA ruled absolutely correctly, and any other ruling would have been irresponsible and not in keeping with the USGA Rules of Golf.
How can anyone say the "PGA messed up big time." This is being chanted all over the web by people who do not have the first clue of what they are speaking.
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
ALIGNMENT G.O.L.F.
|
|

08-15-2010, 10:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
|
|
Originally Posted by KevCarter
|
If you look at the facts rationally, Mark Wilson and the PGA ruled absolutely correctly, and any other ruling would have been irresponsible and not in keeping with the USGA Rules of Golf.
How can anyone say the "PGA messed up big time." This is being chanted all over the web by people who do not have the first clue of what they are speaking.
Kevin
|
really?
I had not seen the "chanting all over the web".
in facct- I have neither heard nor read anything on the subject.
These are my original thoughts. From my personal observations. (on TV )
BUT
I remain;
The "clueless" Bear
|
|

08-15-2010, 10:08 PM
|
 |
Lynn Blake Certified Associate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,955
|
|
Originally Posted by HungryBear
|
really?
I had not seen the "chanting all over the web".
in facct- I have neither heard nor read anything on the subject.
These are my original thoughts. From my personal observations. (on TV )
BUT
I remain;
The "clueless" Bear
|
You expressed your opinion, I expressed mine. I have no desire to argue further.
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
ALIGNMENT G.O.L.F.
|
|

08-15-2010, 10:17 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 392
|
|
|
I agree with the Ruling that had been posted as the local rules everywhere for the player other than maybe on their bag.
Johnson to Fehrity: Maybe I should have read the Rules a little better!
You can disagree about the local rule but not about the Ruling.
__________________
"The only real shortcuts are more and more know how"...TGM
|
|

08-15-2010, 10:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
|
|
|
More Quibbleing
The issue-to me- is not the rule but the method.
There were 2 options.
1- do not confront the player and leave him to sign his card at his own peril
2- Inform the player AND provide complete and dcisive information as to any rule violation.
The problem is that the player did not seem able to make a informed decision. And I don't think anyone known if a rule was in fact violated. No mater how it is spun.
|
|

08-15-2010, 10:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 173
|
|
|
Dumb rule, no rake and people standing in it mean it is a waste area at best. But, they put it in the rules sheet, Johnson should have seen it or his caddy should have. Kevin is right on, it still stinks though. Kaymer could be the next Bob Goalby.
|
|

08-15-2010, 11:13 PM
|
 |
Lynn Blake Certified Associate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,955
|
|
Originally Posted by HungryBear
|
The issue-to me- is not the rule but the method.
There were 2 options.
1- do not confront the player and leave him to sign his card at his own peril
2- Inform the player AND provide complete and dcisive information as to any rule violation.
The problem is that the player did not seem able to make a informed decision. And I don't think anyone known if a rule was in fact violated. No mater how it is spun.
|
Perfect, lets do idea number one, let him sign his card, then we'll have to DQ him and cost DJ about $500,000.00. Makes good sense.
#2 is exactly how it was handled, good job there, where is the quibbling and spin?
I agree with Dodger, very tough ruling, but it is what it is. The officials had no choice but to apply the penalty.
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
ALIGNMENT G.O.L.F.
|
|

08-15-2010, 11:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lake Elmo, MN
Posts: 597
|
|
|
I did not like the way it played out, but once the official explained their stance, I understood and accepted the decision. I don't like it, but I understand it.
I think it was very fortunate they talked to the competitor prior to his signature on the card. It preserved his place in the event and salvaged very good pay day.
Last edited by JerryG : 08-15-2010 at 11:32 PM.
Reason: grammar, context, etc.
|
|

08-15-2010, 11:56 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,433
|
|
Its all very unfortunate but it played out as it needed to given the local rule.
Its a shame that a design esthetic could contribute to such confusion. The course though entirely man made and perhaps a little over the top in its art direction was spectacular to my North American eye. The inspiration for the bunkering design is not from any man made bunkers but from the work of sheep.
And so, Gents, local rules aside, .........I need a ruling.
This is a course I played a few weeks back , Brora in the north of Scotland. Designed by James Braid , sheep and cows wander the course, the greens are surrounded by electric fences , it has bunkers as we know them and then these ones. Freshly made, this one by the fella at the top of the frame who had been resting in it until I spooked him and he left.
If my ball was to come to rest in this "bunker" ......should I considered it a hazard?
P.S. I know this is beside the point as far as Dustin is concerned but I couldnt help but think back to this course and wonder whether James Braid would have grounded his club.
http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/a...d=128193057 5
http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/a...d=128193085 7
Last edited by O.B.Left : 08-16-2010 at 12:02 AM.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 AM.
|
| |