Accumulator 3 Question

[Mike O]

So, it seems to me that as long as the Right Arm is Straightening with its Paddlewheel Action, then the mechanism for powering, guiding, and regulating the #3 Accumulator Motion, is still present in the Golf Swing.

Fine, however, just realize that you're taking a quote from 6-B-1-0 and applying it to the "whole" third accumulator 6-B-3-0 - you can get it a little out of context doing that. It's not the only or required powering source for the #3 accumulator (see 6-B-3-A) - you have other options/ contributors available - depending on shot length etc.

And trust me - he ain't putting down the goat - that's a waste of energy to even ask him that.

[Yoda]

With a Stationary Pivot, Basic Motion, Back and Forth and Zero #3 Accumulator, the Clubface is Opening and Closing to the Plane Line. That's Left Arm Primary Lever for sure, but its guided and regulated by the "Straightening of the Right Arm with its Paddlewheel Action". No?

Absolutely.

And that, the visual 'opening and closing' of the Clubface and the in-line Travel of the Left Arm and Club (Primary Lever), is the result of maintaining the Vertical Left Wrist through the Impact Interval. This is the required Overtaking -- albeit without the Maximum Power or Maximum Trigger Delay present when the Club is Gripped under the Heel of the Left Hand (a normal #3 Accumulator Left Hand-Clubshaft Angle) -- of the Hands by the Club, even with a Zeroed #3 Accumulator (Angle).

The Hands and the Clubhead are, after all, moving in concentric circles, and the Clubhead, with or without any #3 Angle, simply must move from one side to the other and always outside the arc of the Hands.

[BerntR]

With a Stationary Pivot, Basic Motion, Back and Forth and Zero #3 Accumulator, the Clubface is Opening and Closing to the Plane Line. That's Left Arm Primary Lever for sure, but its guided and regulated by the "Straightening of the Right Arm with its Paddlewheel Action". No?

I think that if you use your right hand for anything but sensoring (and possibly that too - because you can't sense without applying some pressure) - and combine it with zero (and not just close to zero but zero) accumulator #3 - you will disturb the rhythm. The only exception is when you steer, such that PP #1, #2 and #3 forces the left wrist to be flat at all times. But without steering and without accumulator #3 lag any pressure from the right hand will disturb the rhythm.

IMO

[HungryBear]

There are "things" that, given a limitation on degrees of freedom a machine cannot "do" without violating a degree of freedom.
So from a mechanical perspective there are two paths. recognize this or just let your eyes glaze over and make necessary compensations.

The Bear

[HungryBear]

After thinking about the question posed at #1.

My answer is NO!

Because ZERO accumulator is NOT an accumulator.

The condition is one of a BASIC machine, constructed with a hinge action, preferred either (dual) horizontal, angled, or (dual) vertical. (if you want to stay on an inclined plane)

Only capable of being pushed or pulled through impact.

there is no out of line condition of the secondary lever assembly.
there is no secondary lever assembly.

Just my opinion.

The Bear

[BerntR]

Sounds like good thinking to me, HB.

[Mike O]

After thinking about the question posed at #1.

My answer is NO!

Because ZERO accumulator is NOT an accumulator.

The condition is one of a BASIC machine, constructed with a hinge action, preferred either (dual) horizontal, angled, or (dual) vertical. (if you want to stay on an inclined plane)

Only capable of being pushed or pulled through impact.

there is no out of line condition of the secondary lever assembly.
there is no secondary lever assembly.

Just my opinion.

The Bear

Nice Hungry Bear!

[12 piece bucket]

Nice Hungry Bear!

Dude . . . he's not a REAL bear moron . . . some bears can be taught to drive, fart on command, star in low budget films and eat cheetoz . . . but type??? Freakin' moron.

Plus . . . some accumulators can be zeroed out and just supply motion no?

[KevCarter]

Dude . . . he's not a REAL bear moron . . . some bears can be taught to drive, fart on command, star in low budget films and eat cheetoz . . . but type??? Freakin' moron.

Plus . . . some accumulators can be zeroed out and just supply motion no?

I do, however, find bears far more attractive than sheep and goats. I think that puts me way further up the evolutionary ladder than you 12 Piece...

Kevin

[12 piece bucket]

I do, however, find bears far more attractive than sheep and goats. I think that puts me way further up the evolutionary ladder than you 12 Piece...

Kevin

Mr. So-fist-toe-kate-id.