CF in hitting.

[whip]

There AIN'T NO C.F. IN TRUE HITTING END OF STORY HOMER WROTE THE BOOK THE END GO SPEND Forty YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH AND FELT BACK TO ME ALL YOU PIONEER'S IF GOLF THEOREM

[HungryBear]

There AIN'T NO C.F. IN TRUE HITTING END OF STORY HOMER WROTE THE BOOK THE END GO SPEND Forty YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH AND FELT BACK TO ME ALL YOU PIONEER'S IF GOLF THEOREM

Could U be a little more specific?

hb

[Bumpy]

There AIN'T NO C.F. IN TRUE HITTING END OF STORY HOMER WROTE THE BOOK THE END GO SPEND Forty YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH AND FELT BACK TO ME ALL YOU PIONEER'S IF GOLF THEOREM

Brilliant argument. Stating your perception then following that with Homer is right does not lend credibility by association. I think everybody agrees Homer is right. If your not capable of developing a valid argument you're just noise.

Bumpy

[O.B.Left]

The problem here again is one of definition. Golfers talking to golfers with science degrees. Homers unique definition of the word mixed in.

I get the feeling no one is wrong above its just a matter of interpretation.

There's no cf (in the pivot power sense of the word ) for Drive Loading but there is cf present in the primary lever . Then there's Hitting with Pivot Power....

[HungryBear]

The problem here again is one of definition. Golfers talking to golfers with science degrees. Homers unique definition of the word mixed in.

I get the feeling no one is wrong above its just a matter of interpretation.

There's no cf (in the pivot power sense of the word ) for Drive Loading but there is cf present in the primary lever . Then there's Hitting with Pivot Power....

OB - I did not mean to get everyone to a "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" question. The question, in my mind, was clear but after all the comments it is not.

One can putt with a little push stroke. As more power is needed #3 and #2 and pivot is increased.
There are proportions, I was looking for others ideas.

Thats all. how do U handle the balance?

HB

[MizunoJoe]

One can putt with a little push stroke. As more power is needed #3 and #2 and pivot is increased.
There are proportions, I was looking for others ideas.

Thats all. how do U handle the balance?

HB

In push putting, only #1 is used, so if you need more power, you push harder. I've never seen a putting stroke which uses #2 or #3, both of which should be zeroed out.

[O.B.Left]

OB - I did not mean to get everyone to a "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" question. The question, in my mind, was clear but after all the comments it is not.

One can putt with a little push stroke. As more power is needed #3 and #2 and pivot is increased.
There are proportions, I was looking for others ideas.

Thats all. how do U handle the balance?

HB

I'd need to know the angle of inclination of the pin head and what sort of footwear the angels are wearing. Rubber soles or leather? The other dimensions I have already from one of Daryl's posts.

Uh what exactly do you want to know? How when Hitting you introduce the various accumulators and more acceleration (lag pressure) through the bag?

[BerntR]

There AIN'T NO C.F. IN TRUE HITTING END OF STORY HOMER WROTE THE BOOK THE END GO SPEND Forty YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH AND FELT BACK TO ME ALL YOU PIONEER'S IF GOLF THEOREM

The earth isn't flat even though Homer Kelley omitted to clearly state that it is round. But you and MizunoJoe use flat-earth-arguments over and over, and attribute them to HK and TGM.

There are a lot of people in golf who understand enough physics to see that your "there ain't no CF in true hitting..." statement above is pure nonsense. Absurd claims such as these give TGM a bad reputation.